Search Results

  • Wodak Tyson

    Tyson was admitted to practice in 1998 and signed the Bar Roll in 2005. He conducts a broad commercial litigation and advisory practice. A selection of matters in which Tyson has been briefed are referred to in the 'Cases' tab.

    Areas of particular interest include:

    • corporate oppression proceedings and other shareholder/director disputes;
    • disputes involving allegations of misleading or deceptive conduct;
    • disputes arising out of restraint clauses - both in sale of business contexts and in the employment context;
    • disputes arising from the intersection of intellectual property and commercial dealings. In recent years he has been briefed in numerous disputes involving allegations of the misuse of confidential information; and
    • professional indemnity claims.

    He has substantial experience in litigation involving estate agents, medical practices and non-English-speaking clients. He has recently acted in a substantial dispute involving a cryptocurrency exchange.

    Tyson is a Graduate Member of the Australian Institute of Company Directors. He holds a Masters Degree in Bioethics, a Graduate Diploma in Applied Finance & Investment and has completed the Company Directors Course.

    Outside his practice at the Bar, Tyson is:

    • President of Bialik College (an independent school with more than 1,000 students spanning creche through to year 12), a director of its associated companies, Chair of its Governance Committee and former Chair of its Risk Management Committee.
    • Chair of the Reid Malley Foundation, a Public Ancillary Fund.

    Before coming to the Bar Tyson practiced as a solicitor (with Piper Alderman Lawyers and with Phillips Fox / DLA Piper) and was an executive in the technology industry. He was co-founder of an Internet-based financial services company.

    Tyson has a strong interest in medical & scientific ethics and related issues. He spent 14 years as a member of the Ethics Committee of the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, retiring in December 2020.

    Cases:


    From 07 Aug 2008, liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards legislation.

  • Whelen Jeremy

    Jeremy acts in commercial disputes, mainly for clients in the construction industry.

    He is also a nationally accredited mediator, and accepts half day and full day mediation engagements in all areas of commercial disputation.

    Commercial disputes

    Jeremy's commercial disputes experience encompasses contracts, insurance (Including coverage disputes), professional indemnity/negligence, corporations, insolvency, property and equity.

    Construction disputes

    Jeremy has been ranked in Doyles Guide (peer reviewed) as a Leading Construction & Infrastructure Barrister (Australia) in 2017 - 2018 and 2020 - 2024, and in the Victorian market in 2015 - 2024.

    Jeremy's construction experience includes disputes arising during project delivery (including bank guarantee injunctions, security of payment, protection works), end-of-project litigation or arbitration (including claims for money and time), and post-project disputes (often for insured professionals such as architects, engineers, building surveyors, fire engineers, project managers and superintendents) or subrogated recovery actions on instructions from insurers. Recent project settings have spanned LNG pipelines, a power station, freeways, solar and wind farms, specialised pavements (ports, distribution centre, racing car track), and commercial and residential developments (including flammable cladding cases). 


    From 01 Jul 2008, liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards legislation.

  • Stephanie Young

    Stephanie has a diverse practice with a particular focus on insurance law, common law, personal injuries and public law. Stephanie is reading with Justin Hooper and her senior mentor is Jeremy Ruskin KC.

    Prior to joining the Victorian Bar, Stephanie was a Senior Associate at Barry Nilsson where she built upon her extensive knowledge in the area of professional indemnity claims in addition to managing a number of public liability and institutional abuse claims. Prior to this, Stephanie was a Managing Principal Solicitor with the Victorian Government Solicitor’s Office (VGSO), where she developed a general and diverse litigation practice for a range of government clients and emanations of the State. Her portfolio spanned torts and breach of statute, general public law litigation, judicial review proceedings, and reviews pursuant to the Crimes (Mental Impairment and Unfitness to be Tried) Act 1997.

    Before joining the VGSO, Stephanie spent five years at specialist insurance litigation firms, where she built her practice in professional indemnity, management liability claims and subrogated recoveries. Stephanie was admitted as a lawyer in the State of New York in 2009 and worked in a small reinsurance law firm for a number of years before moving to Melbourne in 2011.

    Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards legislation.

  • Szydzik Melanie

    Melanie practices in commercial, tort and consumer law in the Federal and State courts. She has particular experience in class actions.

    Melanie is the Chair of the Class Actions Committee of the Commercial Bar Association.

    Before commencing in law, Melanie worked as a scientific researcher, predominantly in synthetic organic chemistry.

    Class actions

    Clarke v JB Hi-Fi Group Pty Ltd – Supreme Court of Victoria, consumer class action

    Bergman v Sportsbet Pty Ltd – Supreme Court of Victoria, consumer class action

    Krakouer v AFL – Supreme Court of Victoria, racial vilification class action

    Thomas & anor v The A2 Milk Company Limited – Supreme Court of Victoria, securities class action

    Tham v Australian Capital Territory [2024] FCA 1508 – Federal Court of Australia, employment class action, settlement approval hearing

    Laricchia v Wisetech Global Limited – Supreme Court of Victoria, securities class action

    Gawler v Fleetpartners Group Ltd – Supreme Court of Victoria, securities class action

    Stallard & anor v Treasury Wine Estates Limited – Supreme Court of Victoria, securities class action

    Huang v Star Entertainment Group Ltd – Supreme Court of Victoria, securities class action

    • [2023] VSC 561 – multiplicity and group costs order

    Lay v Nuix Ltd; Batchelor v Nuix Ltd; Bahtiyar v Nuix Ltd - Supreme Court of Victoria, securities class action, led by Simon Marks KC

    • (2022) ACSR 27; [2022] VSC 479 – multiplicity and group costs order

    Bogan v Estate of Peter John Smedley – Supreme Court of Victoria, securities class action

    • [2023] VSC 105 – security for costs

    Crawford v ANZ & ors – Supreme Court of Victoria, unfair conduct claim, led by Michael Rush KC

    • [2022] FCA 657 – bankrupt lead plaintiff, application for extension of time
    • [2021] VSC 573 – group costs order
    • [2021] VSC 578 – discovery

    McNickle v Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Ltd & ors – Federal Court of Australia, negligence class action concerning Roundup

    • [2024] FCA 1353 – settlement approval hearing
    • [2024] FCA 807 – trial limited to general causation
    • [2023] FCA 1268 – expert opinion evidence
    • [2023] FCA 1216 – case management re closing submissions
    • [2023] FCA 662 – initial trial common questions
    • [2022] FCA 1596 – expert evidence
    • [2022] FCA 1596 – admissibility of expert evidence
    • [2022] FCA 133 – adjournment of trial
    • [2021] FCA 780 – appointment of assessors
    • [2021] FCA 370 – expert evidence

    Shimshon v MLC Nominees Pty Limited & anor – Supreme Court of Victoria, superannuation class action, led by Nicholas Owens SC and with Dr Shipra Chordia

    • [2022] VSCA 18 – costs
    • (2021) 402 ALR 724; [2021] VSCA 363 – appeal re preliminary question
    • [2020] VSC 640 – determination of preliminary question

    Andrianakis v Uber Technologies Inc & ors and Salem v Uber Technologies Inc & ors – Supreme Court of Victoria, conspiracy by unlawful means

    • [2024] VSC 733 – settlement approval hearing
    • [2024] VSC 436 – unregistered group members
    • [2023] VSC 366 – privilege
    • [2023] VSC 56 – strike out application
    • [2022] VSC 643 – privilege appeal
    • [2022] VSC 196 – privilege, including misconduct exception
    • [2021] VSC 744 – sample group members
    • [2020] VSC 885 – strike out application
    • (2020) 61 VR 580; [2020] VSCA 186 – appeal of strike out decision
    • [2020] VSC 152 – amendment to group definition
    • [2019] VSC 850 – strike out application

    Turner v Bayer Australia Ltd & ors, product liability class action, led by Fiona Forsyth KC

    • [2021] VSC 241 – approval of discontinuance and withdrawal of part of the proceeding

    ACN 117 641 004 Pty Ltd v S&P Global Inc – Federal Court of Australia, acted for the second applicant in a dispute concerning whether the proceeding ought to be stayed

    Sister Marie Brigid Arthur (Litigation Representative) v Northern Territory of Australia, settled, administrative law class action, led by Dan Star KC

    • [2020] FCA 215 – settlement approval application
    • [2019] FCA 859 – dispensation with notice requirements

    Court v Spotless Group Holdings Limited – Federal Court of Australia, settled, securities class action, led by Peter Collinson KC

    • [2020] FCA 1730 – settlement approval application

    Fernbrook (Aust) Investments Pty Ltd v AMP Limited – Federal Court of Australia, securities class action, led by Richard Attiwill QC (now the Honourable Justice Attiwill)

    Fletcher v Lendlease Corporation Limited & anor – Supreme Court of New South Wales, securities class action

    Caason Investments Pty Ltd v Simon Xiao Fan Cao – Federal Court of Australia, acted for applicant in dispute with funder

    Bywater v Appco Group Australia Pty Ltd – Federal Court of Australia, settled, employment class action, led by Kristine Hanscombe KC

    Money Max Int Pty Limited v QBE Insurance Group Limited – Federal Court of Australia, settled, securities class action, led by Bernie Quinn KC

    • [2018] FCA 2101 – costs
    • (2018) 358 ALR 382 – settlement approval application

    Manus Island Class Action – Kamasaee v Commonwealth & ors

    • [2018] VSC 138 – settlement distribution scheme
    • [2017] VSC 537 – settlement approval application, led by Fiona Forsyth (now KC)
    • [2017] VSCA 121 – scope of issues to be determined in class action trial, led by David Curtain KC and Fiona Forsyth
    • Ruling No 9 [2017] VSC 171 – live streaming of evidence to group members, led by David Curtain KC
    • Ruling No 8 [2017] VSC 167 – class closure in a group proceeding, led by David Curtain KC and Fiona Forsyth
    • Ruling No 7 [2016] VSC 770 – public interest immunity: foreign relations and Australian Red Cross documents
    • Ruling No 6 [2016] VSC 605 – public interest immunity: foreign relations and International Committee of the Red Cross documents
    • Ruling No 5 [2016] VSC 595 – public interest immunity: cabinet documents, led by Bret Walker SC
    • Ruling No 4 [2016] VSC 492 – public interest immunity; sample foreign relations claims, led by Bret Walker SC
    • Ruling No 3 [2016] VSC 438 – public interest immunity; cross examination in relation to cabinet documents, led by Bret Walker SC
    • Ruling No 2 [2016] VSC 404 – client legal privilege

    Murrindindi Black Saturday Bushfire Class Action – Rowe v AusNet Electricity Services Pty Ltd & ors

    • [2015] VSC 232 – settlement approval application, led by Fiona McLeod SC & Richard Attiwill KC
    • [2014] VSC 553 – expert conclaves
    • [2014] VSC 474 – appeal, client legal privilege, led by Fiona Forsyth

    Kilmore Black Saturday Bushfire Class Action – Matthews v AusNet Electricity Services Pty Ltd & ors

    • [2014] VSC 663 – settlement approval application, led by Robert Richter KC and Lachlan Armstrong (now KC)
    • Ruling No 32 [2013] VSC 630 – role of assessors, led by Andrew Keogh SC (now the Honourable Justice Keogh)
    • Ruling No 31 [2013] VSC 575 – application made pursuant to s 138 of the Evidence Act 2008 (Vic) to exclude evidence obtained improperly, led by Andrew Keogh SC
    • Ruling No 19 [2013] VSC 180 – appointment of assessors, led by Andrew Keogh SC
    • Ruling No 10 [2012] VSC 379 – expert conclaves, led by Tim Tobin SC and Lachlan Armstrong
    • Ruling No 9 [2012] VSC 340 – expert evidence, led by Tim Tobin SC and Lachlan Armstrong
    • Ruling No 6 [2013] VSC 422 – client legal privilege, led by Andrew Keogh SC
    • Ruling No 3 [2013] VSC 116 – obligations under the Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic) and client legal privilege, led by Andrew Keogh SC
    • Ruling No 1 [2011] VSC 167 – application to regularise the proceeding when issued without authority of the representative Plaintiff, led by Robert Richter KC and Michael Lee (now the Honourable Justice Lee)

    Earglow Pty Ltd v Sigma Pharmaceuticals Ltd – Federal Court of Australia, securities class action (settled), led by Julian Burnside KC and Lachlan Armstrong

    Commercial and Consumer Law

    Alcoa of Australia Limited & ors v AusNet Transmission Group Pty Ltd & anor – Supreme Court of Victoria

    Gold Coast Marine Aquaculture Pty Ltd v Aqua Star Pty Ltd & ors – Federal Court of Australia, led by David Collins KC

    Riley v Riley – Supreme Court of Victoria, settled, partnership dispute

    Cargill Australia Ltd v Viterra Malt Pty Ltd – Supreme Court of Victoria, sale of business, led by Richard Attiwill KC; Court of Appeal [2023] VSCA 304 – application for leave to appeal indemnity costs order

    Riviera Farms Pty Ltd v Accensi Pty Ltd – Supreme Court of Victoria, settled, contaminated herbicides, led by David Collins KC

    IOOF Holdings Limited v Maurice Blackburn Pty Limited – Supreme Court of Victoria, settled, confidentiality in whistleblower documents, led by Richard Attiwill KC and Fiona Forsyth

    Other

    Chief Commissioner of Police v Paterson [2023] VSC 172 – firearm prohibition

    Inquiries

    Hazelwood Mine Fire Inquiry 2015 – Investigation into increased incidence of deaths (report available at http://hazelwoodinquiry.vic.gov.au/201516-report/volume-ii-investigations-into-2009-2014-deaths)

    Own Motion Inquiry of the Office of the Racing Integrity Commissioner – Investigation into Laming, Potgieter and Zeyaur Rahman (public summary of the report available at https://racingintegrity.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/164151/Public-Summary-Report-Own-Motion-June-2021.pdf)


    Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards legislation.

  • Tehan Myles

    Myles practises mainly in commercial law, with particular experience in contract, equity, class actions, trade practices, competition, corporations, insurance, professional negligence, telecommunications and technology matters. Myles also has experience in matters involving sports law and defamation.

    Before coming to the Bar, Myles spent over 7 years as a solicitor and then senior associate in the Dispute Resolution group at King & Wood Mallesons, working on a broad range of commercial disputes.

    Prior to undertaking his Articles, Myles spent a year as an Aide to two Governors of Victoria – John Landy AC MBE and Professor David de Kretser AC.

    Myles is a member of the Bar’s Audit, Finance and Risk Committee.

    Some representative matters include:

    • Purchase of business; breach of warranty; misleading conduct: Transonic v Tilakee [2024] VSC 86; [2021] VSC 413 (led by Jack Rush KC and Nick De Young KC, instructed by MinterEllison).
    • Class actions; superannuation: Janssen v OnePath Custodians, Federal Court of Australia [2024] FCA 497 (ongoing) (led by Philip Crutchfield KC and Nick De Young KC, instructed by King & Wood Mallesons).
    • Professional negligence: Pearce v Waller Legal Pty Ltd [2024] VSC 779 (ongoing) (led by Philip Solomon KC, instructed by Lander & Rogers).
    • Defamation: Hun v Aljazeera International (Malaysia) SDN BHD [2023] FCA 1546; [2023] FCA 1103 (led by Renée Enbom KC, instructed by Thomson Geer).
    • Misleading or deceptive conduct: Lanhai Pty Ltd v 7-Eleven Stores Pty Ltd [2023] VSCA 45; [2022] VSC 132; [2021] VSC 587 (led by Philip Solomon KC, instructed by Norton Rose Fulbright Australia).
    • Data/privacy: acting in relation to a number of regulatory investigations into cyber breaches.
    • Wills; estoppel: Re Connock [2023] VSC 488; [2023] VSC 420; [2021] VSC 122; [2021] VSC 64 (unled, instructed by Hall & Wilcox).
    • Contract; misleading or deceptive conduct; restraint of trade: Reid (and ors) v Slade (and ors), Supreme Courts of Victoria and NSW (ongoing) (led by Sam Rosewarne KC, instructed by McCullough Robertson).
    • Royal Commissions: Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability (2023, led by Renée Enbom KC, instructed by Ashurst); Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry (2018, unled).
    • Fraud; equitable duties; contract: Directed Electronics OE Pty Ltd v OE Solutions Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 462; [2022] FCA 1404; [2022] FCA 254 (unled, instructed by McClusky’s Lawyers).
    • Legal professional privilege: Quebani Pty Ltd v McDonald’s Australia Limited (Appeal) [2023] VSC 439 (led by Rob Craig KC, instructed by Norton Rose Fulbright Australia).
    • Telecommunications; contract; misleading conduct: Business Service Brokers Pty Ltd v Optus Mobile Pty Ltd [2022] VSC 774; [2022] VSC 283; [2021] VSC 547; [2021] VSC 310 (led by Gina Schoff KC, instructed by Danaher Moulton).
    • ASIC regulatory proceeding; misleading conduct; penalties: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Allianz Australia Insurance Limited [2021] FCA 1062 (led by Suresh Senathirajah KC, instructed by ASIC).
    • Banking; unconscionable mortgage terms: First Mortgage Capital Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation Ltd [2021] NSWSC 1143 (unled, instructed by Diamonds Solicitors).
    • Employee restraint of trade: Liberty Financial Pty Ltd v Jugovic [2021] FCA 607 (unled, instructed by Herbert Smith Freehills).
    • Competition; administrative review: Application by Flexigroup Limited (No 2) [2020] ACompT 2 (unled, instructed by ASIC).
    • Oppression; corporations: Pacific Dairies Limited v Orican Pty Ltd & Ors [2019] VSC 647 (unled, instructed by DLA Piper).
    • Trusts; equitable duties: Alston v Cormack Foundation Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 895 (led by Allan Myers KC and Ian Hardingham KC, instructed by Frenkel Partners).
    • Contractual interpretation; intellectual property: Apple & Pear Australia Ltd v Pink Lady America LLC [2017] HCASL 83; [2016] VSCA 280; [2015] HCATrans 348; [2015] HCATrans 349; [2015] VSC 617 (led by Rodney Garratt KC, instructed by Hall & Wilcox).
    • Competition; compliance review: Acting as a Compliance Reviewer in respect of orders made by the Federal Court concerning a competition law compliance program (unled, instructed by King & Wood Mallesons).
    • Sports law: acting for a party in the AFL Inquiry into allegations of racism at the Hawthorn Football Club and associated Australian Human Rights Commission complaint (led by Justin Graham KC, instructed by Frenkel Partners); counsel assisting the AFL Tribunal in the Essendon supplements matter; counsel for various players in the AFL Tribunal, AFLW Tribunal and VFL Tribunal; acted as Tribunal and Appeal Board member for various sports.


    From 23 Oct 2014, liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards legislation

  • Collingwood Nicola

    Nicola was an Associate at Maddocks before coming to the Bar where she practised extensively in the local government, planning and environment field.

    As a solicitor, Nicola regularly appeared at VCAT in relation to merits appeals, declaration applications, and enforcement order and contempt proceedings.

    Nicola also had the carriage of appeals from VCAT to the Trial Division of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal in relation to questions of law arising from planning matters.In 2007, Nicola was seconded to the Department of Sustainability and Environment to prosecute summary and indictable wildlife, forestry, and environmental offences and matters on behalf of Heritage Victoria and in her final year at Maddocks Nicola was seconded to Yarra City Council as in-house counsel.

    On her admission, Nicola worked for the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Qld) and in the Advocacy Unit at Crown Law. Nicola also gained commercial litigation experience at a specialist property and litigation firm before joining Maddocks in 2005.

    Nicola currently practises in the local government, planning and environment field. She also appears in liquor licensing matters and at the Victorian Commission for Gambling Regulation.

    Nicola lectures in health and environment law at Swinburne University and teaches statutory planning at RMIT.

    Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards legislation.

    Nicola is currently acting as junior counsel for Volunteer Fire Brigades Victoria, the CFA volunteer firefighters representative association, in the 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission.

  • Cherry Sarah

    Sarah's practice has a particular focus on professional negligence, disciplinary matters and costs disputes.

    She is also regularly briefed in general commercial matters and particularly insurance disputes.

    She also appears in guardianship, administration and Part IV proceedings.

    Sarah appears in interlocutory applications, trials (in Melbourne, regional Victoria and interstate) and on appeals, as well as in mediations. She is regularly briefed to advise in costs disputes, potential disciplinary proceedings and general commercial matters. Her advice is practical and solution-focussed.

    Before coming to the bar in 2005, Sarah was a solicitor for 9 years in Australia and the UK. She was the inaugural head of the Ethics Department at the Law Institute of Victoria and has lectured regularly on professional standards issues.

    She is a former member of the panel of examiners for Monash University, an occasional tutor at the Leo Cussen institute, and a regular speaker by invitation at law practices and conferences.

    Recent decisions include -

    Costs disputes and appeals arising from costs proceedings

    Russels v McCardel [2014] VSC 287 (instructed by the Australian Legal Costing Group before Bell J), successfully defending an appeal from the Costs Court involving provisions of the Electronic Transactions (Victoria) Act 2000 and Part 3.4 Legal Profession Act 2004.

    GLS v Goodman Group Pty Ltd (2015) VSC 627 (instructed by Debra Paver Costs Lawyer before Macaulay J), successfully defending an appeal from the Costs Court involving complex arguments on the law of accord and satisfaction in the context of legal costs under the Victorian statutory regime and the right to review under Division 7 Legal Profession Act 2004.

    Eagle Lawyers v Career Education Consultants Australia Pty Ltd & Anor [2013] VCC 1263 (before Anderson J), successfully obtaining judgment against the first defendant in an action for recovery of legal costs and a dispute as to the basis of charging.

    Numerous costs disputes in VCAT, the Magistrates’ Court and the Supreme Court.

    Disciplinary hearings and appeals

    Tuferu v Legal Services Commissioner [2013] VSC 645 (instructed by the Office of the LSC before Zammit AsJ), successfully defending a judicial review and appeal as to sanction following findings of professional misconduct.

    Numerous disciplinary proceedings since 2009. See most recently for example LSC v Rhoden (Legal Practice) [2015] VCAT 1546, LSC v Tuferu (Legal Practice) [2013] VCAT 1438, LSC v Khan (Legal Practice) [2013] VCAT 651.

    General commercial

    Cross Country Realty Victoria Pty Ltd & Anor v Ubertas 350 William Street Pty Ltd [2015] VCC 1012 (with T North SC instructed by Brand Partners before Lacava J), successfully striking out the plaintiffs’ claim and obtaining summary judgment on a counterclaim relating to payment and retention of commission in breach of mandatory disclosure obligations under the Estate Agents Act 1980, and opposing a subsequent successful application for leave to appeal with D Collins SC.

    Solari v CGY Insurance Ltd (No.1) [2015] VCC 207 (before Misso J), considering the construction of contractual terms in a claim against a deemed manufacturer and brought directly against the insurer pursuant to s601AG Corporations Act 2001.

    Probate, administration and Part IV

    Matthews v Matthews [2009] VSC 308 (Osborn J) - successfully applying to remove an executor on grounds of serious misconduct.

    Re will and estate of Angelo Marotta (dec’d) [2011] VSC 324 (Zammit AsJ) - successfully defending a claim for summary dismissal under Part 4.4 of the Civil Procedure Act 2010; the implications of “no real prospect of success” in the context of a Part IV claim.

    From 19th July 2012, liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards legislation.

  • Chadwick Wong

    Chadwick practises primarily in public law, commercial and regulatory law, and white-collar crime. He has particular interest in corporate misconduct, class actions, international law and human rights.

    Before coming to the Bar, Chadwick had a broad career spanning the public, private and not-for-profit sectors. He was most recently General Counsel at Grata Fund, a public interest litigation funder, working on cases involving climate litigation, gender discrimination and First Nations rights. Previous roles have included Acting Principal Solicitor and Senior Solicitor at the Public Interest Advocacy Centre specialising in strategic litigation, Associate at Allens working on regulatory investigations and disputes, and Adviser at the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, advising on public law and policy, including in national security.

    Chadwick was also Associate to the Hon Justice Mortimer, now Chief Justice of the Federal Court.

    Chadwick holds a Bachelor of Laws (First Class Honours) and a Bachelor of Arts in Government and International Relations from the University of Sydney. He also has a Master of Laws specialising in International Law (with Distinction) from the Australian National University

    Chadwick read with Fiona Batten. His senior mentor is Neil Clelland KC.

    His recent cases include:

    Public and regulatory

    • Active Sports Management Pty Ltd v Industry Innovation and Science Australia (judicial review of taxation decision, led by Stephen Lloyd SC and Fiona Batten)
    • GRP18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2024] FedCFamC2G 927 (unled)
    • JSWC and Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs (Migration) [2024] AATA 2 (unled)
    • EWO18 and Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs (unled, Minister conceded)
    • Dzajkovska and National Disability Insurance Agency [2023] AATA 3952 (unled)
    • Advice work relating to the listing of private health insurance benefits as well as numerous statutory interpretation and migration advices

    Class actions

    • Yong v Westpac Banking Corporation (shareholder class action, led by Wendy Harris KC, with Leana Papaelia, Dion Fahey, Tom Rawlinson)
    • Janssen v OnePath Custodian Pty Ltd & Ors (superannuation class action, led by Kristine Hanscombe KC, with Alexandra Folie, Tim Farhall, James Page, Michela Agnoletti)

    Crime

    • CDPP v Bowen (insider trading, led by Neil Clelland KC and Ruth Shann SC, with Felicity Fox)
    • Various bails, committals, pleas and appeals for the OPP and defence


    Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards legislation.

  • Mintz Colette

    Colette practises primarily in public and commercial law.

    Before coming to the Bar, Colette served as Associate to Justice Edelman of the High Court of Australia.

    Earlier, she practised as a solicitor at King & Wood Mallesons, predominantly in competition law, and served as Associate to Justice Katzmann of the Federal Court of Australia.

    Colette holds a Bachelor of Arts and a Bachelor of Laws, with first class honours, from Monash University and a Master of Laws from Columbia University, which she attended on a scholarship and where she was named a James Kent Scholar.

    Colette has served as a Fellow at Melbourne Law School, where she lectured in constitutional law. She has also published work in the Public Law Review.

    A selection of her recent matters is as follows:

    Commercial law

    • Taxi Apps Pty Ltd v Uber Technologies Inc (Supreme Court of Victoria, reserved) (conspiracy to injure, breach of confidence): for the plaintiff in 26-day trial, led by Michael Hodge KC, with Kane Loxley and Kalia Laycock-Walsh.
    • Slea Pty Ltd v Connective Services Pty Ltd (No 9) [2022] VSC 136 (oppression, directors’ duties): for the successful plaintiffs, following a 52-day trial, led by Michael Hodge QC, with Kathleen Foley and Geoffrey Kozminsky; and on appeal: Millsave Holdings Pty Ltd v Connective Group Pty Ltd [2023] VSC 326.
    • Lees v Connective Services Pty Ltd [2019] VSCA 143 (statutory construction, Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)): for the successful respondents, led by Catherine Button QC, with Geoffrey Kozminsky.
    • Jones v Waller Legal Pty Ltd (Supreme Court of Victoria, ongoing) (negligence, misleading conduct): for defendant, proceeding declassed following successful application, led by Philip Solomon KC.
    • Selak v National Tiles Co Pty Ltd [2023] VSC 446 (legal professional privilege, misconduct exception): for plaintiff, with Geoffrey Kozminksy.
    • iSignthis Limited v ASX Limited (Federal Court of Australia, resolved) (challenge to decision to suspend applicant’s securities from quotation on the ASX): for the ASX, led by Neil Young KC, with Brendan Lim.
    • Andrianakis v Uber Technologies; Taxi Apps Pty Ltd v Uber Technologies [2022] VSC 643 (legal professional privilege, misconduct exception): for successful respondent, led by Tony Bannon SC, with Robert Yezerski.
    • Flash Lighting Company Ltd v Australia Kunqian International Energy Co Pty Ltd [2021] HCASL 50 (contract): for successful respondent, led by Jonathon Moore QC, with Geoffrey Kozminsky.
    • Salter Brothers Asset Management Pty Ltd v Hendry (contract, employment): for respondents, obtained order for summary dismissal of proceedings (McElwaine J, Federal Court of Australia, unreported, 10 June 2022), unled on dismissal application; otherwise led in proceeding by Robert Craig QC, with Franceska Leoncio.
    • Townshend v Fendall Farms Pty Ltd (Federal Court of Australia, ongoing) (oppression, fiduciary duties): for defendants, unled. See, relatedly, Townshend as Legal Representative for the Estate of Mervyn Townshend v Fendall Farms Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 848 (application for derivative leave, led by Ian Waller KC).
    • ACCC v TasPorts (Federal Court of Australia, resolved) (proceeding under s 46 of Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)): for the ACCC, led by Wendy Harris QC and Nick De Young QC, with Chris Tran.
    • In the Matter of Grand Land Property Pty Ltd (Supreme Court of Victoria, resolved during trial) (oppression, misleading conduct): for defendants, led by Robert Craig KC, with D’Arcy Hope.
    • Thexton v Mialls Gun Shop (Supreme Court of Victoria, resolved during trial) (negligence, misleading conduct): for defendants, led by Richard Attiwill QC.

    Public law

    • COVID-19 Hotel Quarantine Inquiry: for Department of Premier and Cabinet, led by Richard Attiwill QC.
    • Ridd v James Cook University [2021] HCA 32 (construction of enterprise agreement): for appellant, led by Stuart Wood QC, with Ben Jellis.
    • Plaintiff M1/2021 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 17 (administrative law): for plaintiff, led by Richard Knowles QC.
    • Santos v Tipakalippa [2022] FCAFC 193 (administrative law): for successful respondent, led by Claire Harris KC, with Nick Baum.
    • Dhu v State of Western Australia (Federal Court of Australia, ongoing) (discrimination, constitutional law): for respondent in class action, led by Robert Craig KC.
    • Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Chauhan (County Court of Victoria, reserved) (proceeds of crime, unexplained wealth): for AFP Commissioner in application for unexplained wealth order, led by Robert Craig KC.
    • Secretary, Attorney-General’s Department v Bhagwandas [2023] FCA 398 (administrative law, appeal from AAT on question of law): for successful respondent, unled.
    • Asmar v Albanese (No 4) [2021] VSC 672; Asmar v Albanese [2022] VSCA 19; Asmar v Albanese [2022] HCASL 71 (proceeding concerning validity of Federal ALP intervention in Victorian Branch of ALP): for plaintiffs / appellants, led by Ron Merkel QC, with Emrys Nekvapil and Katharine Brown.
    • Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd v Civil Aviation Safety Authority [2021] FCA 1160; Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd v Civil Aviation Safety Authority (No 2) [2021] FCA 1337 (administrative law, ban on helicopter use during Melbourne protests): for successful applicants, led by Will Houghton QC.
    • Melton City Council v Minister for Planning [2021] VSC 700; [2022] VSCA 144 (administrative law): for plaintiff / appellant, led by Emrys Nekvapil.
    • Celsius Fire Services Pty Ltd v Magistrates’ Court of Victoria [2019] VSC 835; Celsius Fire Services Pty Ltd v Magistrates’ Court of Victoria (No 2) [2020] VSC 120 (administrative law): for the successful plaintiff, led by Anthony Strahan QC.
    • WOTCH v VicForests (Supreme Court of Victoria, resolved while judgment reserved) (environmental law): for plaintiff in long-running litigation, including large trial, led by Richard Knowles KC and Kathleen Foley SC, with Shawn Rajanayagam. See WOTCH v VicForests (No 2) [2020] VSC 99; WOTCH v VicForests (No 3) [2020] VSC 220; WOTCH v VicForests (No 4) [2020] VSC 433; WOTCH v VicForests (No 8) [2021] VSC 268; WOTCH v VicForests (No 9) [2022] VSC 503.
    • ABC v Victims of Crime Assistance Tribunal [2021] VSC 730 (statutory construction): for successful applicant, led by Alistair Pound SC.

    Colette is also regularly briefed to advise government on questions of constitutional law and statutory construction.

    Colette read with Kathleen Foley, now SC, and her senior mentor is Wendy Harris KC.

    From 3 May 2019, Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards legislation.

  • Haban-Beer Astrid

    Astrid Haban-Beer has a practice incorporating criminal law, public law and regulatory investigations. Astrid’s practice includes appearing in jury trials, royal commissions, inquests and investigation hearings.

    Astrid has particular experience with matters involving organised crime, white collar crime including Federal Court criminal matters, corruption matters, Commonwealth Code matters, public interest immunity, and matters involving the intersection of criminal and civil law.

    Astrid is on the panel of special counsel able to be appointed under the Terrorism (Community Protection) Act 2003 (Vic).

    Astrid also has a special interest in mental impairment and hearings conducted pursuant to the Crimes (Mental Impairment and Unfitness to be Tried) Act. Astrid appears in special fitness hearings and supervision order/review proceedings.

    Astrid has a strong civil regulatory background and has acted for and against regulators across jurisdictions, including in both civil and criminal proceedings in the Federal Court, and state courts and tribunals.

    Astrid has a current high level security clearance and has capacity to undertake sensitive matters in a range of legal and/or investigatory contexts.

    Astrid undertakes court appearances (trials, pleas, committals and applications) and advice work across all jurisdictions, in criminal, quasi-criminal and civil proceedings, covering areas of:

    • proceedings arising out of investigations conducted by the ACCC, ASIC, ATO, AFP and IBAC;
    • Open Courts Act - suppression orders and related applications;
    • Murder, and violent crimes;
    • dangerous driving causing death;
    • White collar crime (including criminal proceedings in the Federal Court);
    • mental impairment (including special hearings and review proceedings);
    • public interest immunity and other privileges (including subpoena arguments);
    • competition and consumer law including civil penalty proceedings;
    • terrorism, organised crime and national security;
    • fraud and corruption offences;
    • drug offences;
    • sexual offences, including Commonwealth Criminal Code offences;
    • internet and cyber offences, including Commonwealth Criminal Code offences and privacy offences;
    • customs (including tariffs), biosecurity and quarantine offences, and animal cruelty matters;
    • copyright matters; and
    • Coroner's Court matters.

    Astrid has frequently acted for government and institutional clients, and individuals in a number of Royal Commissions including:

    • The Royal Commission into the Management of Police Informants
    • The Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse
    • The Royal Commission into Trade Union Governance and Corruption
    • The Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry.

    Astrid is a Victoria Legal Aid Criminal Trial Preferred Barrister, and holds an Indictable Crime Certificate (ICC).


    From 16 May 2013, liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards legislation.

  • Moloney Stephen

    Mr Moloney is a senior barrister in Melbourne and a member of the Victorian Bar who practises in corporate and commercial law, administrative and constitutional law, equity, professional discipline, professional negligence, common law, insurance, defamation, medical negligence and family law (appellate).

    He holds a trial and appellate practice and an advice practice.

    His specialisation in public law includes all aspects of the regulation of medical practitioners, particularly at a Commonwealth level.

    He acts for both all Health Professionals and their regulatory Boards in disciplinary proceedings (trial and appellate).

    He is experienced in Inquiries and Arbitration (both local and international) and he has chaired an Inquiry into the probity of scientific research under the NHMRC guidelines and appears in Inquiries, including as counsel assisting.

    He has appeared and been retained in a number of large-scale commercial cases over the last twenty years.

    He practises in the High Court of Australia, the Supreme Court of Victoria and the Federal Court (trial and appellate). He is a Member of the Australian Bar Association, is admitted in New South Wales and Western Australia and is a member of the Bar in each of those States.

    He is the Chairperson of the Medicare Participation Review Committee of Australia, thrice appointed by the Federal Government. By this office he chairs a committee which makes determinations about whether certain health practitioners should retain the right to participate in the Medicare Scheme and whether their provider rights are to remain.

    He is the immediate Past-Chairperson of the Australian Institute of Administrative Law (Victorian Chapter), and The Medico Legal Society of Victoria, and is a member of the Administrative Law Committee of the Law Council of Australia. He currently chairs a large private secondary school of 1200 students.


    Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

  • Zeleznikow Sarah

    Sarah practises primarily in commercial and public law. Sarah also accepts briefs in law enforcement, quasi-criminal and some common law matters.

    Sarah is regularly briefed to advise and appear in trials, appeals and other hearings within those fields, including in competition and consumer, financial services, constitutional and statutory interpretation matters. In 2018, Sarah was part of the team of counsel assisting the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry.

    Before coming to the Bar, Sarah was an Associate to the Hon Justice Stephen Gageler AC at the High Court of Australia. Sarah also worked as a Trial Division Researcher at the Supreme Court of Victoria, a solicitor in the Dispute Resolution team of King & Wood Mallesons, and a sessional lecturer in the JD program at Melbourne Law School.

    Sarah holds undergraduate degrees in Arts and Law (with First Class Honours) from the University of Melbourne, and a Master of Laws from Harvard Law School.

    Recent matters in which Sarah has been briefed include:

    Commercial and regulatory law

    • Electoral Commissioner of the Australian Electoral Commission v Laming (2024) 304 FCR 561 and [2024] HCASL 330: for the Commissioner, led by T Begbie KC
    • Karpik v Carnival plc [2023] HCA 39; (2023) 98 ALJR 45: for the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth and the ACCC, intervening, led by S Donaghue KC, Solicitor-General of the Commonwealth and R Higgins SC, with S Rajanayagam
    • Re Telstra Corporation Ltd (2023) 376 FLR 1: for the ACCC, led by M Hodge KC, with D Roche and M Salinger
    • ACCC v Ashton Raggatt McDougall Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 351: for the ACCC, led by E Bennett SC
    • Proceedings under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (Cth) (Federal Court of Australia): for the CEO of AUSTRAC, led by M Hodge KC, with C Gleeson, A Poukchanski and W Liu
    • ACCC v BlueScope Steel Ltd (Federal Court of Australia): for the ACCC, led by M Hodge KC, with S Chordia (see, eg, [2020] FCA 625)
    • Vodafone Hutchison Australia Pty Ltd v ACCC [2020] FCA 117: for the ACCC, led by M Hodge KC and C Button KC, with N de Young, T Prince and D Foster
    • Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry (2018): Part of the team of counsel assisting, led by R Orr KC and M Hodge KC, with A Dinelli, E Dias, M Costello, M Hosking, C Schneider and T Farhall
    • Director, Consumer Affairs Victoria v The Reject Shop [2018] FCA 211: for the respondent company, led by R Orr KC and P Neskovcin KC
    • Application for merger authorisation by Tabcorp Holdings [2017] ACompT 1; ATPR 42-550: for the ACCC, led by A McClelland KC, with K Anderson, P Thiagarajan and I Cowen
    • Abrahams v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (Federal Court of Australia, 2017, resolved prior to hearing): for the applicants, led by R Merkel KC, with E Nekvapil

    Sarah also has experience in: other aspects of Part IV of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), including misuse of market power (Federal Court of Australia, led by R Orr KC, with D Roche) and informal merger clearances (led by P Collinson KC with S Hogan and S Rajanayagam); the Australian Consumer Law (led by M Hodge KC); and proceedings under the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth).

    Constitutional law

    • Maxwell v Hersant (Magistrates’ Court of Victoria, Case No P12425201): for the Attorney-General of Victoria, intervening
    • YBFZ v The Commonwealth [2024] HCA 40; (2024) 99 ALJR 1: for the Commonwealth, led by S Donaghue KC, with M Hosking
    • Albyn Queensland Pty Ltd v Australian Postal Corporation [2024] VSC 584: for the Attorney-General of Victoria, intervening, with L Chircop
    • Yuan An v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2024] VSC 518: for the Attorney-General of Victoria, intervening, with L Chircop
    • Vanderstock v Victoria [2023] HCA 30; (2023) 98 ALJR 208: for the State of Victoria, led by R Orr KC, Solicitor-General for Victoria, with M Salinger
    • Carr v Attorney-General of the Commonwealth [2023] FCA 1500: for the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth, led by T Begbie KC
    • Unions NSW v New South Wales [No 3] [2023] HCA 4; (2023) 277 CLR 627: for the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth, intervening, led by S Donaghue KC, with S Rajanayagam
    • Thurin v Krongold Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd [2022] VSCA 226; (2022) 407 ALR 187: for the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth, intervening, led by G Hill SC
    • Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v Montgomery (High Court of Australia, resolved prior to judgment): for the Northern Land Council, intervening, led by S Glacken KC
    • LibertyWorks Inc v The Commonwealth [2021] HCA 18; (2021) 274 CLR 1: for the Commonwealth, led by S Donaghue KC, with B Lim
    • Zhang v Commissioner of Police [2021] HCA 16; (2021) 273 CLR 216: for the Commissioner, led by S Donaghue KC and P Herzfeld SC
    • Palmer v Western Australia [2020] FCA 1220 and [2020] FCA 1221: for the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth, intervening, led by S Donaghue KC, with P Herzfeld and M Hosking
    • Zheng v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police [2020] HCATrans 91: for the Commissioner, led by L Cheeseman SC, with D O’Leary
    • Smethurst v Commissioner of Police [2020] HCA 14; (2020) 272 CLR 177: for the Commissioner and the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth, intervening, led by S Donaghue KC and C Lenehan SC
    • Minogue v Victoria [No 2] [2019] HCA 31; (2019) 268 CLR 1: for the State of Victoria, led by P Hanks KC, with A Pound
    • Palmer v Australian Electoral Commission [2019] HCA 24; (2019) 269 CLR 196: for the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth, led by S Donaghue KC, with G del Villar
    • Re Canavan [2017] HCA 45; (2017) 263 CLR 284: for Mr Windsor, led by R Merkel KC and J Gleeson SC, with E Nekvapil

    Sarah also has experience in matters relating to ss 51(xxxi) (High Court of Australia, led by R Orr KC, with T Goodwin), 90 (High Court of Australia, led by K Walker KC, Solicitor-General for Victoria, R Orr KC and C Young SC) and 109 of the Constitution (Supreme Court of Victoria, led by P Hanks KC).

    Other public law matters

    • Patrick v Australian Information Commissioner [2024] HCASL 291: for the Commissioner, led by Z Maud SC, with A Wharldall
    • Northern Territory of Australia v Aboriginal Land Commissioner [2023] FCA 1183: for the Northern Land Council, led by S Glacken KC
    • Harris v Victorian Electoral Commission [2020] VSC 676; (2020) 62 VR 460: for the plaintiffs, led by P Hanks KC
    • DBE17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] HCA 47; (2019) 266 CLR 156 (and related proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia): for the applicant, led by B Walker SC and B Quinn KC, with M Albert and M Guo
    • Chief Commissioner of Police v AMJK Pty Ltd [2018] VSC 250: for the Chief Commissioner, led by P Hanks KC
    • Northern Territory v Griffiths; Commonwealth v Griffiths [2017] FCAFC 106; (2017) 256 FCR 478: for the native title party, led by S Glacken KC, with G Hill
    • Proceedings in the original jurisdiction of the High Court of Australia, the original and appellate jurisdictions of the Federal Court of Australia and the Federal Circuit Court of Australia under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth): for both the applicant and the Minister, and both led and unled (see, eg, Lasalo v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2024] FCA 790)

    Law enforcement and quasi-criminal matters

    • Pre-committal and pre-trial hearings in the Magistrates’ Court of Victoria and the County Court of Victoria: for the Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police
    • Benbrika v Attorney-General of the Commonwealth; Attorney-General of the Commonwealth v Benbrika [2024] VSC 265: for the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth, led by P Hanks KC, with S Rajanayagam and M Jackson
    • Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Luppino [2021] FCAFC 43; (2021) 284 FCR 233: for the Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police, led by N Williams SC
    • Proceedings under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) (County Court of Victoria): for the Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police, led by R Craig KC
    • Proceedings under the Extradition Act 1988 (Cth): for the requested person, led by R Orr KC, C Harris KC and L De Ferrari SC (see, eg, United States v Ghodskani [2018] FCA 14)

    Sarah also has experience in foreign bribery matters (led by R Orr KC, with M Keks).

    Common law

    • Eildon Resort Pty Ltd v State of Victoria (Supreme Court of Victoria, resolved prior to hearing): for the State of Victoria, led by L Brown, Crown Counsel
    • Tortious proceedings for the recovery of land (Supreme Court of Victoria, resolved prior to hearing): for a local council, led by R Orr KC, with R Knowles
    • Proceedings alleging professional negligence against legal representatives (Supreme Court of Victoria): for a member of counsel, led by D Collins KC, and for a firm of solicitors, led by S Horgan KC
    • Sarah also has experience in matters involving false imprisonment, misfeasance in public office and novel duties of care.


    Sarah was a reporter for the Commonwealth Law Reports from 2016-2022.

    From 27 Oct 2016, liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards legislation.  

  • Jellis Benjamin

    Ben appears in common law, public law (administrative and constitutional law) and insurance, often in appeals and for judicial review.

    Before coming to the Bar, Ben completed the Bachelor of Civil Law at the University of Oxford, graduating with Distinction (highest honours). He was the associate to Justice Redlich at the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court Victoria. He practiced as a solicitor at King & Wood Mallesons.

    Ben has particular expertise in the regulation of the medical profession and in medical negligence. Ben has appeared in many reported insurance cases. He was counsel in the Banksia class action.

    Ben has a national practice in administrative law, with a focus on the regulation of health practitioners.

    Ben's current reader is Shane Dawson. His is a former member of the Victorian Bar Council and the Counsel Committee. He is currently a member of the Ethics Committee of the Victorian Bar.

    Some matters in which Ben has appeared as counsel:

    Judicial Review

    T v Coroners Court of Victoria and Northern Health [2022] VSC 70

    Zhao v Medical Board of Australia [2021] VSC 763

    Kew v Director of Professional Services Review [2021] FCA 1607

    Nursing and Midwifery Board v Robinson [2021] VSC 823

    Appanna v Medical Board of Australia [2021] VSC 679

    Gilhooley v Health Complaints Commissioner [2021] VSC 232

    Municipal Association of Victoria v VWA [2021] VSC 128

    Ridd v JCU [2021] HCAtrans 15

    CDC v Health Complaints Commissioner [2020] VSC 597

    JCU v Ridd (2020) 382 ALR 8; [2020] FCAFC 123

    CFMMEU v Anglo American Australia Ltd (2019) 164 ALD 451 [2019] FCAFC 109 (Full Court) (unled)

    RIdd v JCU (Peter Ridd Academic Freedom Case) [2019] FCCA 997

    AWU v ROC (the AWU Raids Case) [2019] FCA 188

    AMMA v CFMMEU (CFMEU and MUA Amalgmation Case) (2018) 363 ALR 343 (Full Court)

    Adams v Dr Wadesley [2018] VSC 604 (with J Noonan QC)

    SDA v AIG (the Penalty Rates Case) (2017) 253 FCR 368 (Full Court)

    Rajendran v The Heritage Council (2017) 220 LGERA 303; [2017] VSCA 48 (Court of Appeal)

    Sevdalis v PSRC (Medicare) [2017] FCAFC 9 (with C Winneke QC) (Full Court)

    Cremorne Commercial v Arnold Prince [2017] VSC 714 (with J Pizer QC)

    McDermott v AWU (2016) 255 IR 146 (Full Bench)

    Sevdalis v PSRC (Medicare) (2016) 241 FCR 266 & [2016] FCA 433 (with C Winneke QC)

    Rajendran v The Heritage Council (No 2) [2016] VSC 286

    Just Group Ltd v Nicole Peck [2016] VSC 432

    CSR Ltd v CSR and Holcim Staff Association (2015) 232 FCR 302 (Full Court)

    CFMEU v Boral (2015) 256 CLR 375 (High Court)

    Baytech Trades v Coinvest [2015] VSCA 342 (Court of Appeal)

    CFMEU v Grocon [2014] VSCA 298 and (2014) 47 VR 527 (Court of Appeal)

    CFMEU v John Holland (2015) 228 FCR 297 (Full Court)

    Energy Australia Yallourn v CFMEU (2014) 218 FCR 316 (Full Court)

    Dr Bruce Reid v Australian Football League (Defence of Dr Reid/ AFL ASADA) (with R Gillies QC)

    Insurance

    Delta Pty Ltd v Team Rock Anchos [2019] 3 QD R 438 (Queensland Court of Appeal)

    Delta Pty Ltd v Team Rock Anchors [2018] 1 QD 564 (with J Gleeson QC) (Supreme Court Qld )

    Daffy v MLC [2017] VSCA 110 (with P Murdoch QC) (Court of Appeal)

    Service v Post Super Pty Ltd [2017] VCC 1500

    Montclare v Metlife (2016) 344 ALR 685 [2016] VSCA 386 (with J Gleeson QC) (special leave refused) (Court of Appeal)

    Linfox Australia v TAC (2016) 78 MVR 177 [2016] VSC 592 (with P Solomon QC)

    Montclare v Metlife [2015] VSC 306 (with J Gleeson QC)

    Common Law, Inquests and Health Practitioners

    Acciarito v Anthony Parcel Services [2022] VSCA 13

    Fischer v Brown [2021] VCC 108

    Appanna v Medical Board [2021] VCAT 277

    Medical Board v Arulandarajah [2021] VCAT 85

    Nursing Board v Meek [2021] VCAT 68

    Fischer v Brown VCC [2020] VCC 2041

    Belgrave Heights Christian School v Moore [2020] VSCA 240 (with J Ruskin QC) (Court of Appeal)

    Billington v Sussan Corporation [2020] VSCA 12 (with S O'Meara QC) (Court of Appeal)

    Medical Board of Australia v Islam [2020] VCAT 994

    Medical Board of Australia v Ellis [2020] VCAT 862

    Nursing Board of Australia v Keenoo [2020] TASHPT 3

    Leow v Medical Board of Australia [2019] VSC 532 (appeal)

    CJE v Medical Board of Australia [2019] VCAT 178

    Dental Board of Australia v Ho [2019] VCAT 467

    XDH v Medical Board of Australia [2019] VCAT 377

    CDC v Health Complaints Commissioner [2019] VCAT 171

    CDC v Health Complaints Commissioner [2018] VCAT 1844

    Hunt & Numurkah District Health Service v Holcombe [2018] VSCA 248 (Court of Appeal) (with P Solomon QC)

    Medical Board of Australia v Farschi [2018] VCAT 1617 with Dr I Freckleon QC

    Pharmacy Board of Australia v Hanna [2018] VCAT 1817

    Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia v Macrae [2018] VCAT 1707

    Pharmacy Board of Australia v Hopkinson [2018] VCAT 982

    Hunt v Hunt [2018] VSC 55 (with P Solomon QC) 5970

    Inquest into the death of Campbell (COR 2014 5828)

    Inquest into the death of Ljepojevic (COR 2015 5970)

    Holcomb v Mr Hunt & Numurkah Hospital District Health Service [2017] VSC 666 (with P Solomon QC)

    Northern Health v Kuipers [2015] VSCA 172 (with R Gillies QC) (Court of Appeal)

    Stapleton v Central Club Hotel [2016] VCC 91 (with S O'Meara QC)

    Swansson v Harrison & Ors [2014] VSC 118 (with R Gillies QC)

    Curran v Loddon and Campaspe Centre Against Sexual Assault [2017] VCAT 999

    E v Physiotherapy Board of Australia [2017] VCAT 1401

    Khouri v Business Licensing Authority [2015] VCAT (with J Pizer QC)

    CMJ v Crewdson [2015] VCAT 402

    DPP v JPH (No 2) (2014) 239 A Crim R 543 [2014] VSC 177 (for the Attorney General) (part trial)

    Commercial Law

    Roohizadegan v Technologyone [2020] FCA 1571, [2020] FCA 1734, [2020] FCA 1729

    Mandie v Memart Nominees Pty Ltd [2017] VSCA 177 (Court of Appeal) (with R Gillies QC)

    McCarthy v Camil Holdings Pty Ltd [2016] VSCA 235 (Court of Appeal) (for the respondent)

    Mandie v Memart Nominees Pty Ltd [2016] VSC 267 (with R Gillies QC)

    Bolitho v Banksia Securities Ltd (Banksia Class Action) [2014] VSC 8 (with T Kelly QC)

    Bolitho v Banksia Securites Ltd (No 2) (2014) 100 ACSR 161; [2014] VSC 184

    Cosmopolitan Hotel v Crown (2014) 45 VR 771 (Court of Appeal) (with N Hopkins QC)

    Shaw v MAB Corporation Pty Ltd (2014) 220 FCR 425

    Shaw v Yarranova Pty Ltd [2014] VSCA 48 (Court of Appeal)

    Crown v Cosmoplitan Hotel [2013] VSC 614 (with N Hopkins QC)

    Shaw v MAB Corporation Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 1231 (with T Kelly QC)

    Point of Pay Pty Ltd v Darryl Roots [2012] VSC 380 (with P Solomon QC)

    MP Investments Nominees Pty Ltd v Bank of Western Australia [2012] VSC 43 (with P Solomon QC)

    Werner Motoring Group Pty Ltd v NMX Pty Ltd [2012] VSC 211

    Select Publications

    "Making Sense of Project Blue Sky" Melbourne 21 March 2012 (with Peter Hanks QC)

    "The Intersection between Administrative and Constitutional Law" Melbourne March 2013 (with Peter Hanks QC)

    "Preventative Detention. Constitutional Issues" March 2014 (with Peter Hanks QC)

    "Challenging Administrative Decisions; Constitutional Considerations" March 2015 (with Peter Hanks QC)

    "Constructive Jurisdictional Error" March 2016 (with Peter Hanks QC)

    "The Obligation of Procedural Fairness During Multistage Decision Making Processes" March 2017 (with Peter Hanks QC)

    Administrative Law: Disciplinary and Statutory Investigations September 2021 (with S Dawson)

    Reporter, Commonwealth Law Reports 2012-2015


    From 27 Oct 2011, liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards legislation approved under Professional Standards legislation.

  • Hayes Paul

    Advises and appears in cases at interlocutory, trial and appellate levels, (common law litigation, commercial & equity litigation, international law & arbitration, large scale litigation, constitutional & administrative law and sporting disputes), conducted in multiple jurisdictions, but primarily in Melbourne, Sydney, Perth, London, Singapore, Kuala Lumpur and Lausanne. Frequently appears in common law jury cases and causes conducted in the Supreme and County Courts of Victoria, including in the field of defamation.

    Appointed a Senior Fellow (Course Director of the subject 'International Sports Arbitration') at Queen Mary University of London (School of Law) in 2022. Previously a Senior Fellow at the University of Melbourne (Faculty of Law), 2010-2022. Recognised internationally in Who's Who Legal (2016-2025 editions) as a leading lawyer in the specialty of sports law and listed by Doyle’s Guide as a leading senior counsel in arbitration and administrative & public law.

    Holds degrees from the Queensland University of Technology (LLB) and the University of Cambridge (MSt). Prior to commencing practice at the Bar, practised as a Lawyer (1986 to 1990) at: Power & Power, Brisbane; Allen Allen & Hemsley (Allens), Sydney; and Baker & McKenzie, Sydney.

    Chambers located in Melbourne (Owen Dixon Chambers West, Level 9 - Dever's List) and London, Singapore and Kuala Lumpur (39 Essex Chambers).

  • Batrouney Edward

    Ed has a broad commercial practice, including financial services, international arbitration, professional negligence, civil fraud, class actions, corporations, insolvency, and regulatory matters. He also acts in media / defamation matters and disciplinary proceedings.

    Ed has been recognised in Doyle's Guide as a leading commercial litigation and dispute resolution barrister since 2020.

    Ed has also been called to the Bar of England and Wales and is a member of Essex Court Chambers, a leading international law and arbitration set.

    Ed graduated with first class honours in law from Melbourne University and completed the BCL (Distinction) at the University of Oxford.

    From 1st May 2015, liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards legislation.

  • Lamb Paul

    Paul practises in common law for both plaintiffs and defendants / insurers.

    Paul has particular experience in medical negligence and also appears in public liability, product liability, class actions, professional disciplinary matters for medical practitioners and appeals. He frequently appears unled or leading.

    He is recommended by Doyle’s Guide in Insurance and Personal Injury Law and has been since 2019.

    Before coming to the bar, Paul was a senior associate at DLA Piper. He read with Judge Patricia Riddell and his senior mentor was Ross Gillies KC.

    From 27 Oct 2016, liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards legislation.

  • Wolahan Keith

    Keith practises in commercial and public law.

    He remained a Member of the Bar while serving as the Federal Member for Menzies (2022-2025), during which he sat on the Economics and National Anti-Corruption Commission Committees. Before coming to the Bar in 2010, he was a solicitor at King & Wood Mallesons and Ashurst.

    From 03/06/2010, Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

  • Sebastian Campbell

    Seb practises in commercial litigation, including contracts, class actions, corporations, equity, insurance, and insolvency. He has experience appearing, both led and unled, in the Federal Court of Australia and Supreme Court of Victoria, as well as other courts and tribunals.

    In addition to his commercial practice, Seb regularly appears to prosecute matters on behalf of the Commonwealth and also practises in sports law.

    His experience before coming to the Bar includes:

    • Associate at Allens in the commercial litigation and banking & finance groups;
    • Federal Prosecutor with the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions; and
    • Integrity Partner at Cricket Australia working in the Cricket Australia Integrity Unit.

    Seb commenced his legal career as Associate to his Honour Judge William Everson of the District Court of Queensland. He graduated from the University of Queensland with degrees in Law (with Honours) and Science.

    He read with Banjo McLachlan. Philip Crutchfield KC is his senior mentor.

    Selected cases:

    Appellate

    Australian Grand Prix Corporation v World Touring Melbourne Limited – Court of Appeal, Supreme Court of Victoria – alleged breach of contract (led by Philip Crutchfield KC and Geoff Kozminsky)

    Commercial law

    Indi Pty Ltd as Trustee for the Hewitt Business Trust vs InComm TCN Holdings Pty Ltd – Supreme Court of Victoria – alleged breach of contract (led by Nicholas De Young KC)

    Newman & Anor v Chubb – Supreme Court of Victoria – insurance dispute (led by Hamish Austin KC and Jessica Apel)

    Intellectual property

    Deakin University v Peter Macreadie & Anor – Federal Court of Australia – alleged breach of consumer law and trademark dispute (led by Luke Merrick KC)

    Roller Networks Australia Pty Ltd v Rat Pack Adventures Pty Ltd & Ors – Federal Court of Australia – alleged breach of copyright and misuse of confidential information (led by Luke Merrick KC)

    Interlocutory

    Ryan Meuleman v Slater & Gordon Ltd – Supreme Court of Victoria – return of subpoena (led by Philip Crutchfield KC)

    Stuart Smith (Liberal Party of Australia) v City of Boroondara – Supreme Court of Victoria – urgent interlocutory injunction concerning election materials during the 2025 Federal Election (led by Dean Luxton)

    Sports law

    AFL – providing written advice to the Board of an AFL Club

    AFL – preparing written submissions to the AFL Tribunal on behalf of players


    Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards legislation.

  • Ben Holding

    Ben practises in commercial, public law and discrimination matters. He has a significant practice in work-related areas, including employment law, industrial law and occupational health and safety.

    Ben appears at trial and appellate level for a diverse range of clients. He regularly appears for corporations, government departments, individuals and associations at State and federal levels. He acts for clients in a variety of industries, including healthcare, education, manufacturing, construction and banking and finance.

    Before coming to the Bar, Ben worked in private practice at Holding Redlich, predominantly in the workplace relations and safety team. He also practised in-house at KDR Victoria Pty Ltd (trading as Yarra Trams) and accepts briefs directly from in-house counsel.

    Ben holds a Bachelor of Laws (with Honours) and Bachelor of Arts from Monash University.

    Ben read with Jack Tracey KC. His senior mentor is Jonathan Kirkwood SC.

    Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards legislation.



    Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards legislation.

  • Wilkinson Jonathan

    Jonathan practices in commercial litigation.

    He has a broad commercial practice involving trial and appellate advocacy, pleadings, opinion work and mediations principally in the Supreme Court and County Courts of Victoria.

    He practices primarily in contracts, corporations law, insurance, real and personal property, partnerships and trusts, consumer law, banking and finance.

    SELECT CASES:

    SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA

    NAB v ANEW Climate LLC: Supreme Court of Victoria proceeding briefed by NAB regarding international account transfers, “Know Your Customer” regulations, freezing order, default judgment, garnishee application (with Hamish Austin KC)

    GFL Developments Pty Ltd v SJ Moore Road Pty Ltd: Supreme Court of Victoria proceeding about real estate agent’s exclusive auction authority, whether certain and binding, entitlement to commission.

    Manpreet Singh v Singh Associates Pty Ltd: Supreme Court of Victoria proceeding regarding unit trust dispute, alleged manufactured debts, oppression. Related subpoena disputes.

    Candibon Pty Ltd v Nameplan Pty Ltd: Supreme Court of Victoria proceeding about partnership profits from greenfield site development projects. Security for costs application, subpoena dispute with implied waiver issue, further discovery applications, application to amend pleadings regarding contribution for “same damage”, application to withdraw admissions in pleadings.

    Alco Aluminium Pty Ltd v Ferny Creek Store Pty Ltd & Ors: Supreme Court of Victoria proceeding briefed by lender about secured debts, consolidated loans, variations and oral terms.

    Melbourne City Council v ATET: Supreme Court of Victoria proceeding briefed by MCC insurer about licence revocation, damages claim by licensee.

    Tom Gibbons Pty Ltd v Vantage Integrated Services Pty Ltd & Ors: Supreme Court of Victoria proceeding about shareholder oppression.

    M&R Transport (Vic) Pty Ltd v ISR Truck City Geelong Pty Ltd & Ors: Supreme Court of Victoria proceeding about shareholder oppression.

    Gordion Holdings Pty Ltd v Ionnides & Ors: Supreme Court of Victoria proceeding regarding setting aside foreign default judgment, indemnity costs.

    Kanyon Pty Ltd v Brett Hartwig: Supreme Court of Victoria proceeding about supplier indemnity under s 274 of ACL. Application to join third party supplier.

    Archery Capital Pty Ltd v Rujan Properties Pty Ltd: Supreme Court of Victoria proceeding about enforcement of loan agreement, deed of forbearance, possession order, indemnity costs.

    Frog Swamp Pty Ltd v Statewide Secured Investments Pty Ltd
    : Supreme Court of Victoria proceeding to set aside statutory demand; genuine dispute regarding valuation evidence (and many other statutory demand and creditors petition matters, not listed here)

    Davison v Kempson: Successful appeal in Victorian Court of Appeal regarding testator family maintenance provision claim.

    Secretary to the Department of Justice v YEE: Successful appeal in Victorian Court of Appeal from VCAT decision (with Phillip Solomon KC).

    COUNTY COURT OF VICTORIA

    SNH Products Pty Ltd (Veganpet) v Advanced Pet Care of Australia Pty Ltd: Supreme Court of Victoria proceeding about breach of supply contract, fitness for purpose, misleading and deceptive conduct, loss and damage.

    Veneziano Coffee Roasters Pty Ltd v Appliance Maintenance Company Pty Ltd: County Court of Victoria proceeding briefed by insurer about applicability of Goods Act to commercial coffee roaster from USA, expert evidence about fitness for purpose.

    Uebergang v AAI Limited: County Court of Victoria proceeding briefed by insurer about policy of insurance for property damage, remediation costs, inconvenience damages.

    Palomares v Insurance Manufactuers of Australia Pty Ltd & Ors: County Court of Victoria proceeding briefed by insurer about policy of insurance for property damage, mould expert dispute, inconvenience damages.

    Ashford v AAI Limited: County Court of Victoria proceeding briefed by insurer about policy of insurance for property damage, remediation costs, inconvenience damages (with Tyson Wodak).

    Real Estate Institute of Victoria Ltd v Realestateview.com Pty Ltd: County Court of Victoria proceeding about breach of contract to produce real estate TV series, loss and damage, misleading and deceptive conduct, estoppel, quantum meruit, unjust enrichment.

    Melbourne Facades Pty Ltd v CPB Contractors Pty Ltd and Lendlease Engineering Pty Ltd: County Court of Victoria proceeding about breaches of level crossing removal works contracts, written and implied terms, variations and waiver, misleading and deceptive conduct, estoppel and quantum meruit.

    30HM SDA1 Pty Ltd v Accelerated Loans:
    County Court of Victoria proceeding about debt recovery by private lender.

    Maersk Line A/S v Fertinvest Australia Pty Ltd: County Court of Victoria proceeding regarding breaches of bills of lading for shipping and freight costs.

    OTHER EXPERIENCE

    Brightgreen Pty Ltd v Marcott Pty Ltd: VCAT dispute regarding unlawful re-entry of leased premises, whether ‘retail premises’, whether land tax payable, whether unjust enrichment (with Robert Hay KC).

    Jonathan also has extensive experience with interlocutory applications associated with all commercial disputes, including caveat removals, security for costs, subpoena applications, freezing and Mareva orders, and costs applications.

    He runs The Commercial Law Barrister blog and endeavours to run a paperless practice.


    "From 20th May 2011, liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation."



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17