MINTZ, Colette

Enquiry / Availability

MINTZ, Colette


Colette practises primarily in public and commercial law.

Before coming to the Bar, Colette served as Associate to Justice Edelman of the High Court of Australia.

Earlier, she practised as a solicitor at King & Wood Mallesons, predominantly in competition law, and served as Associate to Justice Katzmann of the Federal Court of Australia.

Colette holds a Bachelor of Arts and a Bachelor of Laws, with first class honours, from Monash University and a Master of Laws from Columbia University, which she attended on a scholarship and where she was named a James Kent Scholar.

Colette has served as a Fellow at Melbourne Law School, where she lectured in constitutional law. She has also published work in the Public Law Review.

A selection of her recent matters is as follows:

Commercial law

  • Slea Pty Ltd v Connective Services Pty Ltd (Supreme Court of Victoria): acted for the plaintiffs in a 52-day commercial trial involving claims of oppression and breaches of directors’ duties (led by Michael Hodge QC, with Kathleen Foley and Geoffrey Kozminsky) (reserved).
  • Lees v Connective Services Pty Ltd [2019] VSCA 143 (Court of Appeal): acted for the successful respondents in appeal concerning the scope of the Court’s power pursuant to s 241 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (led by Catherine Button QC, with Geoffrey Kozminsky).
  • Salter Brothers Asset Management Pty Ltd & Anor v Hendry & Ors (Federal Court of Australia): acting for cross-respondent in proceeding concerning, among other things, breach of contract and employment entitlements (led by Robert Craig SC).
  • Thexton v Mialls Gun Shop (Supreme Court of Victoria): acted for defendants in personal injury proceeding, including claims of negligence and breaches of trade practices legislation (led by Richard Attiwill QC) (resolved).

Public law

  • COVID-19 Hotel Quarantine Inquiry: acting for the Department of Premier and Cabinet (led by Richard Attiwill QC).
  • Celsius Fire Services Pty Ltd v Magistrates’ Court of Victoria [2019] VSC 835 (Supreme Court of Victoria): acted for the successful plaintiff in judicial review proceeding arising out of a prosecution under the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 (Vic) (led by Anthony Strahan QC).
  • IPO Wealth Pty Ltd v ASIC (Federal Court of Australia): acted for ASIC in proceeding brought by the applicant, seeking to restrain ASIC from issuing a warning notice under s 12GLC of the ASIC Act 2001 (Cth) on administrative law grounds (led by Richard Knowles SC).
  • WOTCH v VicForests (Supreme Court of Victoria): acting for the plaintiff in proceeding concerning legality of certain logging activities following the 2019/2020 bushfires (led by Kathleen Foley, with Julia Watson). See WOTCH v VicForests (No 2) [2020] VSC 99; WOTCH v VicForests (No 3) [2020] VSC 220; WOTCH v VicForests (No 4) [2020] VSC 433.
  • Acting for the Commissioner for the Australian Federal Police in proceeds of crime proceeding arising out of unexplained wealth provisions in the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) (led by Elizabeth Cheeseman SC and Robert Craig SC).
  • Acting for health practitioner regulators in a number of disciplinary proceedings arising from the cluster of stillbirths and neonatal deaths that occurred at Djerriwarrh Health Service (led by Stephen O’Meara QC, with Ben Jellis).

Colette is also regularly briefed to advise government on questions of constitutional law and statutory construction.

Colette read with Kathleen Foley and her senior mentor is Wendy Harris QC.

From 3 May 2019, Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards legislation.







Back to List | Print Page

Page Top


* Required


First Name *

Last Name *

Email Address *

Phone Number

Preferred Date *


Join Dever's List

Are you interested in joining our list?

Read More

CPD Seminars

Subscribe to CPD Session Announcements.


McPhee Mediation Centre

Excellent facilities in a bright and roomy environment. The McPhee Mediation Centre has been designed to create an environment conducive to obtaining successful mediation results. Its configuration allows you to bring parties together for mediation and then separate them from private consultation as required.


Read More